Looking for a second pair of eyes before we tag a release.
We keep configs in git and treat live changes as a hotfix branch.
Client target: 12.x/13.x OTC builds with our custom modules disabled for the repro.
Any safer pattern for rolling this out without wiping houses?
---
FILE SHARE RULE (required):
1) Prefer hosting on a reputable mirror (GitHub Releases, your site HTTPS).
2) Every download link MUST include a VirusTotal analysis URL for that exact file hash.
3) Paste: file name, version, SHA-256, VirusTotal link, supported client/engine, license.
4) Archives without a VirusTotal link will be removed.
Example VT link format: https://www.virustotal.com/gui/file/<sha256>
Synthetic example package: ots-community-tool-3228.zip
SHA-256: 6f74732d73796e7468657469632d66696c652d333232372d6f70656e54696269
VirusTotal: https://www.virustotal.com/gui/file/6f74732d73796e7468657469632d66696c652d333232372d6f70656e54696269
Note: demo hash for seed content only — replace with your real release hash before publishing.
Tutorial draft: Linux systemd unit (#3228)
Started by Spellforge - 6/28/2026, 6:12:17 PM - 4 replies
Map looks promising. Hunting loop needs clearer signage near the temple. Also: please keep the VirusTotal link next to the mirror. Example: https://www.virustotal.com/gui/file/6f74732d73796e7468657469632d66696c652d333232372d6f70656e54696269
Thanks — we saw the same spike when market history grew past 500k rows.
Agree on the VirusTotal rule for binaries. Hash + VT link or it does not ship.
If you share the stacktrace (redact IPs), I can compare with our build.
Post a reply
Posting as Member